I'm sure Searo could tell you the joys
I'm sure Searo could tell you the joys 
1The reason I didn't come forward about this when it happened was because goto had a golden boy reputation at the time Goto having a golden boy reputation? I wanna see that alternate reality


Clover is going to be tomojin's big moment 




TI-83 was postponed indefinitely because a ton of games require either Mirage or ION OS, which are what gets hashed in those cases. It also autosaves/autoloads when the core is loaded. So yeah, more work to be done there.
I felt like like I was making a genuine point and then they brought up their own lack of accountability with the wario world which felt like it tainted the whole thing
I hope you know it's not personal in any way
I hope you know it's not personal in any way
(edited)
I felt like like I was making a genuine point and then they brought up their own lack of accountability with the wario world which felt like it tainted the whole thing 




Opened New Super Mario Bros. Wii (USA) (En,Fr,Es) (Rev 2).iso
Hashing 128 byte main header for [P[B.]
Hashing 520 byte title metadata (partition type 0)
Hashing 1024 encrypted clusters (32505856 bytes)
Generated hash 22072114884813d3693de1bf8ab04270~/Desktop
❯ md5 "Onimusha Warlords.iso"
MD5 (Onimusha Warlords.iso) = 95ba88f008047afe383438de812d947d
~/Desktop took 5s
❯md5 tool provided by macOS~/Desktop
❯ time md5 "Onimusha Warlords.iso"
MD5 (Onimusha Warlords.iso) = 95ba88f008047afe383438de812d947d
md5 "Onimusha Warlords.iso" 4.59s user 0.42s system 99% cpu 5.016 total
~/Desktop took 5s
❯ time xxh128sum "Onimusha Warlords.iso"
d0296aba2b74fc939dd2999fc76c5ace Onimusha Warlords.iso
xxh128sum "Onimusha Warlords.iso" 0.23s user 0.18s system 99% cpu 0.410 total
xxHash128 is fast and tamper-resistant. I can hash a 4GB iso in 230ms.
1Benchmark 1: xxh128sum "Onimusha Warlords.iso"
Time (mean ± σ): 397.8 ms ± 1.8 ms [User: 210.3 ms, System: 187.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 396.3 ms … 401.3 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: b3sum "Onimusha Warlords.iso"
Time (mean ± σ): 200.6 ms ± 0.8 ms [User: 2142.2 ms, System: 389.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 199.1 ms … 202.0 ms 14 runs
Benchmark 3: b2sum "Onimusha Warlords.iso"
Time (mean ± σ): 3.048 s ± 0.020 s [User: 2.806 s, System: 0.238 s]
Range (min … max): 3.020 s … 3.085 s 10 runs
Benchmark 4: md5 "Onimusha Warlords.iso"
Time (mean ± σ): 5.024 s ± 0.036 s [User: 4.576 s, System: 0.444 s]
Range (min … max): 4.996 s … 5.111 s 10 runs
Summary
b3sum "Onimusha Warlords.iso" ran
1.98 ± 0.01 times faster than xxh128sum "Onimusha Warlords.iso"
15.20 ± 0.12 times faster than b2sum "Onimusha Warlords.iso"
25.05 ± 0.21 times faster than md5 "Onimusha Warlords.iso"
Benchmark 2: b3sum "Onimusha Warlords.iso"
Time (mean ± σ): 200.6 ms ± 0.8 ms [User: 2142.2 ms, System: 389.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 199.1 ms … 202.0 ms 14 runs200ms to load a 4GB file implies 20GB/s read. Time (mean ± σ): 200.6 ms ± 0.8 ms [User: 2142.2 ms, System: 389.4 ms]
200.6ms is wall clock time, but CPU time was 2142.2ms. It's using all my CPU cores (14+) simultaneously. That probably makes it not a great candidate for an alternative hashing algorithm - it's just spreading CPU time across a bunch of cores, and I just happen to have a bunch of cores.
xxHash128 is single-threaded.
1

## Important notice regarding PCSX2
Due to recently-discovered achievement stability issues, **all nightly versions of PCSX2 must be updated to version 2.5.162 or above** by <t:1758286800:F> to continue earning hardcore achievements. Unfortunately, the stable version of PCSX2 will be incompatible with hardcore achievements until the next stable release (2.5). We have no estimated period for the next stable release, so please use nightly in the meantime. The nightly version can be found on the homepage of [PCSX2](https://pcsx2.net/) by clicking the "Latest Nightly" button.
And of course, please do not bother the PCSX2 developers about it; assuredly, they are hard at work to resolve the issues, and PCSX2 Stable will be re-enabled for hardcore achievements when we confirmed the issues are resolved. Thank you for understanding! (edited)



1



1
1
he was using that name the last time I was in a server with him, Celeryyy, ackman, and other banned folks (edited)









1



4
3

(edited)
Time to grab some coffee and jump back into the trenches 

doomhiker,
You have been muted for an indefinite time, and your access to the Discord has also been revoked. We have warned you multiple times to not mini-mod, or be combative towards other users, but the warning has clearly fallen on deaf ears. An appeal may be made once enough time has passed.
However, we want to state once again that we are doing this for your own good. As you had contacted Nepiki for a voluntary mute, as well as your post in site-feedback, it is clear that you cannot resist the temptation to visit the forums and join discussions at the cost of your own mental health. We cannot provide what you have requested for at this point in time, which is to hide forums entirely, but we hope this at least will make you less tempted to visit them. Furthermore, attempting to evade the mute will result in a ban, so hopefully this works as extra motivation to avoid the forums.
That said, your reports are justified, and we would not like to pretend they aren't. Please be assured that we are taking your reports seriously, and will taken action where needed.
-RAdmin
Might need a few more looks (edited)
2
thanks for all your help

3
1

1
1
1
1


1
1
1
Pornoman seems fine imo the "sex" at the end doesn't seem like rape
1~Z~ Play Z'd games ~Z~
1



1
Based on that yeah, I understand
1
(edited)


1
https://docs.google.com/document/d/110xrZ9tGLPVE7a9MhWrXsZTodnZktK5jW5klcU3-yIA/edit?tab=t.0



1